Discussion posts are some of my favourite posts to read. New ideas get shared that way, or old ideas are revisited and given a new spin. And of course, I get to be my opinionated self as I hoist my views upon others, while pretending to be objective. Or maybe not. I do welcome alternate views and I’d love to hear from you in the comments!
Recently I reviewed How To Lead A Life Of Crime by Kirsten Miller, for which I slapped on this content warning:
That’s the default warning message that Ashley from Nose Graze included in the Ultimate Book Blogging Plugin. It’s also pretty much one that I was looking for. After all, there is underage drinking, extensive use of profanities, somewhat graphic sexual content too, drug abuse and graphic violence too. Basically, all these things are featured in that book, so I felt compelled to draw attention to that as well. Even though I loved it, I didn’t want to be responsible if somebody picks it up because of my review and then hates it precisely because they are offended. To appease my conscience then, I decided to go the way of age ratings for book.
Looking back on my own childhood, I doubt my mother would have been all too excited if I had been 14 when I read it. She would have worried about age-appropriate content. When it came to movies, she especially made sure my sister and I didn’t watch any that were restricted from our age. Even if my father decided that a movie was too strictly rated and allowed us to watch those DVDs with him at home, my mother protested. For books though, my parents let me read whatever I wanted. Sometimes they even pushed books into my hands which would make me blush today. The point is, I was too young to fully understand what some of these things meant, so it didn’t pose much of a problem anyway. Movies are visual media, so things a child previously did not know suddenly is thrust right into their faces. Plus, if a book was too difficult to understand, I usually didn’t make it past the first chapter.
Yet I am concerned about the increasing sexual content and coarse language in YA books. I’ve been reading them since I was 12, so I must say I definitely noticed an increasing trend over the past ten over years. The justification that this is how teens talk is a ridiculous one to me as well. Maybe I’ve been leading a pretty sheltered life but sometimes I feel that these things are included to perceivably up the entertainment value more than to add to the richness or realness of the character representations. Sure, I’ve had schoolmates as a teen who punctuated their sentences with “f***” and many profanities that were not only in English but also in the various other languages that they could speak. Still, most of them didn’t. Exposing teens to such material in a manner that makes it look normal does subconsciously tell them that it’s okay. And that is something I that makes me wary.
On the other hand, alcoholism, drug abuse, violence, sex and such are also realities for many teens out there. Not including these in books would also be wrong. Pretending that the world is perfect is a futile exercise and also, I believe, more damaging if children are led to believe that these things do not exist.
Because I largely review largely YA books, I’ve been thinking about my responsibility to add content warnings. These things are very much culturally bound and also depend a lot on children’s upbringing and environments. What may be alright today for most, might have been taboo 30 years ago. Based on experience, I’d say Europeans are more open to these than Americans are who in turn are more liberal than Asians. Of course, there also the matter of religion, personal principles and what-not.
In the end I decided that trying to determine if content warnings are in order is a one-way trip to a very slippery slope. I don’t want to be responsible for what kids read. Parents should be in charge of that. Not me. I don’t know these kids. I did not set up this blog to tell parents what all these books contain to help them make their jobs easier either. There are other dedicated blogs for that. Nonetheless, I may exercise some discretion and still include these for books were I do feel a line has to be drawn. Should that happen, I will include a line or two explaining why.
How do you feel about the inclusion of content warnings on YA books? Should they or should they not be included in reviews?
Hmm…I’m not really sure how I feel about this. I feel like it only makes sense to tag a review if your actual REVIEW is for mature readers, right? I mean, I guess it’s okay to warn younger readers that the book you’re reviewing might not be for them…but wouldn’t they learn that through Goodreads/the library/their parents? Maybe it’s better to be safe than sorry, but it’s not like anybody could blame your review for making somebody read an inappropriate book. And I’m really against censorship and kind of think that kids should be able to read basically whatever they want.
The one thing I do make sure to mention in a review, though, is when I think a book that is specifically geared towards young adult readers may be inappropriate for some of them. Like in my review for THE DIVINERS, I mentioned that I thought it was a very mature book because of some of its themes, and said that I didn’t really think it was “young adult” and that it might not be okay for readers younger than 16 or 17. But it totally depends on the parent to make that call…I’m just putting the information out there.
I think this is partially why I don’t have a clear stand. YA books are technically targeted at teens but I’m in my early twenties, so I just about fall out of range of the intended audience. Which means that I expect my reviews to mostly be for readers like me who no longer are teens, so content warnings are largely superfluous. But if a teenager does come across my reviews, I might just wish I had tagged on some form of warning if I knew of that reader and a particular book might just not be appropriate for them. (Hope that makes sense ’cause it’s kinda long-winded.) Means I’m with you on your call about THE DIVINERS.
And you made a good point about putting the information out there. Nobody can expect us to be exhaustive in our information, so that appeases my conscience by a whole lot!
I think warnings should be added anyway. As you said, many different types of people accept different things, but there will always be those who aren’t okay with it. So I suppose it should be mentioned.
But all in all, I don’t really know if they’re necessary, because the review might mention it. I’m not sure. I do know that I’m used to drinking appearing in YA, so I don’t really comment on it.
Oh well. Guess I’ll have to remember to make tags like this soon.
Good point. Maybe just a mention in the review itself suffices. I’m still trying to figure out how to go about it all though because it is a delicate matter and also a matter of personal preference, I think. Then there still is this whole issue of this being a move towards censorship of sorts…